Skip to content

Enno Dünkel

My feedback

138 results found

  1. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Enno Dünkel shared this idea  · 
  2. 14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Enno Dünkel shared this idea  · 
  3. 219 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Enno Dünkel supported this idea  · 
  4. 24 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Enno Dünkel supported this idea  · 
  5. 35 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Enno Dünkel supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Enno Dünkel commented  · 

    Moin,
    schöne Idee - gibt's auch noch einmal in englisch und 2x auf deutsch:

    https://docuware.uservoice.com/forums/230572-configuration-english/suggestions/33414766-add-bcc-and-cc-options-to-the-email-tasks-in-workf

    https://docuware.uservoice.com/forums/230575-client-deutsch/suggestions/35372827-mails-von-einem-workflow-sollen-auch-als-cc-bzw-bc

    https://docuware.uservoice.com/forums/230575-client-deutsch/suggestions/35202811-workflow-email-versand-an-cc-bcc

    Zusätzlich:
    Vielleicht denkt man auch darüber nach, den "VON" definierbar zu gestalten - ist ggf. einfacher als mehrere SMTP-Server ansprechen zu müssen (was auch schon eine Idee hier ist)

  6. 11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Enno Dünkel shared this idea  · 
  7. 17 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Enno Dünkel commented  · 

    In an online application process it would be nice if the recipient won't see the E-Mail-Adress of the personnel Officer

    Enno Dünkel supported this idea  · 
  8. 30 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Enno Dünkel commented  · 

    Moin,
    für mich sieht es ein bischen so aus, als ob der neue X-Rechnungs-Standard den ZUGFeRD-Standard ablöst zumindest war ZUGFeRD 1.0 nicht ausreichend um die Vorgaben der EU zu erfüllen - jedenfalls habe ich das so aus dem WWW herausgelesen.

    Enno Dünkel supported this idea  · 
  9. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Enno Dünkel shared this idea  · 
  10. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Enno Dünkel supported this idea  · 
  11. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Enno Dünkel supported this idea  · 
  12. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Enno Dünkel shared this idea  · 
  13. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Enno Dünkel supported this idea  · 
  14. 12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Enno Dünkel supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Enno Dünkel commented  · 

    Moin,

    ein anderer Ansatz könnte sein, dass sich jeder Nutzer eine Art "Stumm-Schaltung" je Aufgabe aktivieren kann (also feiner noch als je Workflow).
    Dabei müsste diese Stummschaltung für den Admin einsehbar gestaltet werden

  15. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Enno Dünkel commented  · 

    STRG+W ist schnell gedrückt. Ab DW 7 nun auch mit Dokumenten-Historie erreichbar - cooles Feature!

  16. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Enno Dünkel commented  · 

    Moin,

    meines Wissens nach ist das sehr wohl möglich - eine Datenzuweisung am Ende des ersten WF ändert die Indexdaten so, dass diese den Auslöse-Bedingungen des zweiten WF entsprechen - so funktioniert das bei uns einwandfrei bei einem Kunden - schwieriger wird es bei Stichwortfeldern

  17. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Vielen Dank für Ihre Idee.
    Im Augenblick konzentrieren wir uns auf andere Themen, deshalb planen wir diese Idee nicht für zukünftige Veröffentlichungen. Wenn die Nachfrage nach diesem Thema steigt, werden wir diese Idee eventuell wieder aufgreifen.

    Aktuell kann dies mit der Vieweransicht “DocuWare Viewer mit Indexdialog in neuem Fenster öffnen” erreicht werden.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Enno Dünkel commented  · 

    Moin,

    "Kühn" meint genau das Feature "One-Click-Indexing" -allerdings ist dieses Feature in der dritten Viewer-Ansicht möglich: "DocuWare Viewer mit Indexdialog in neuem Fenster öffnen" - eine Nutzer-Einstellung im Tab "Viewer".
    Da ich dieses Feature aber in den anderen beiden Ansichten genauso benötige, bleibt dieser Wunsch hier aber genauso bestehen - das wird dringend benötigt!

    Enno Dünkel supported this idea  · 
  18. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Enno Dünkel commented  · 

    "Indexeinträge ändern" als Funktion im Kontextmenü des WF-Managers sollte konfigurierbar gestaltet werden - habe bisher keine Möglichkeit dafür gefunden Anwendern dieses Recht zu entziehen

    Enno Dünkel shared this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Enno Dünkel commented  · 

    Hallo Herr Schwarz, wie sieht es hierzu aus? 6.7 sieht für mein Verständnis nicht besser aus. Mein Case 213326 ist auch zu - was soll ich tun um genau diese Ergebnisliste definieren zu können?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Enno Dünkel commented  · 

    „Ich beziehe mich hier auf "aus einem Workflow" - aus definierten Ergebnislisten haben Sie natürlich Recht - aber aus einem Workflow (6.6) habe ich keine Möglichkeit gefunden.“

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Enno Dünkel commented  · 

    Wenn ich über einen Workflow (WF-Manager) den Viewer öffne und daraus die Infobox mit STRG+ALT+I öffne, dann ist die sich daraus öffnende Maske von der Reihenfolge her wahrlos aufgebaut und es gibt derzeit nichts, wo ich diese Reihenfolge definieren kann. Ich würde es begrüßen, wenn dann auch die Möglichkeit bestünde zu definieren, ob es änderbare Felder sind, oder nicht

  19. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment
    Enno Dünkel commented  · 

    Es wäre auch sinnvoll, wenn man eine Entkopplung von SQL-Befehl und den Workflows "hard-coded" hinbekäme.
    Beispiel: Es ändert sich etwas an der Datenbank, jetzt muss ich 20 Workflows an 40 Stellen ändern und habe überall neue WF-Versionen.
    Schöner wäre es doch, wenn man eine Art "Function" nutzte, die dann als Variable an 40 Stellen im WF ist und dann diese Änderung nur 1x im WF-Designer global gemacht wird

    Enno Dünkel shared this idea  · 
  20. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Enno Dünkel supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base