Skip to content

Matt Duncan

My feedback

4 results found

  1. 15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Matt Duncan supported this idea  · 
  2. 12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Matt Duncan supported this idea  · 
  3. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Matt Duncan commented  · 

    This request is based on user work flow and the need to be able to quickly identify a record to move it through to the correct person in our underwriting group. Example, our user has opened and reviewed result lines 10-22 which should be sent to underwriter 1 but line 23 has an issue and should be sent to underwriter 2. Have line #'s would make it so much more efficient than trying to retain 8 digit contract #'s for each record.

    Matt Duncan shared this idea  · 
  4. 37 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Matt Duncan supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base