Jared
My feedback
8 results found
-
4 votes
Thank you for your idea.
Right now we are focusing on other topics, so we are not considering this idea for future releases. If the demand for this topic increases, we might add it to future plans.An error occurred while saving the comment Jared
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesJared
supported this idea
·
-
68 votesJared
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
Thank you for your idea. We added it to our collection of ideas and features and will further investigate it. We currently cannot say exactly when this idea will be implemented. As soon as we have more information we will update its status.
An error occurred while saving the comment Jared
commented
Numerous applications of this... showing vendor names in the list, and then storing a vendor ID number - that way if the name changes slightly, you still have a good record by the ID.
I am able to solve the problem above by autoindexing on save, but that is a clunky solution.
Jared
supported this idea
·
-
115 votes
Thank you for your idea. We added it to our collection of ideas and features and will further investigate it. We currently cannot say exactly when this idea will be implemented. As soon as we have more information we will update its status.
Jared
supported this idea
·
-
238 votesJared
supported this idea
·
-
20 votes
Thank you for your idea. We added it to our collection of ideas and features and will further investigate it. We currently cannot say exactly when this idea will be implemented. As soon as we have more information we will update its status.
Jared
supported this idea
·
-
70 votes
Thank you for your idea. We added it to our collection of ideas and features and will further investigate it. We currently cannot say exactly when this idea will be implemented. As soon as we have more information we will update its status.
An error occurred while saving the comment Jared
commented
Just had this issue, user created a data record and then couldn't store due because of our duplicate value settings. Voted.
Jared
supported this idea
·
This is critical and is the main source of index entry errors within our system.
To further this idea, I'd like the ability to turn on a "Lock" per user. This lock would keep the viewer and the index entry screen in sync (on the same document) at all times. It's all too easy to think you are editing index entries for the document in the viewer when you are not.
Also, if this "Lock" was on and you made changes to index entries, then applied a stamp that saves/closes the document, it could save the stamp and index entries all together.