Geoff M
My feedback
18 results found
-
223 votesGeoff M
supported this idea
·
-
169 votes
Of course the security of our users is important to us.
As you have noticed, this idea still has the same status, but was not declined. That means we evaluate it regularly.One reason why we have decided not to add this security feature yet is that we will first change the authentication flow.
As a first step, we introduced the Identity Service in the DocuWare Cloud with Version 7.3, which allows integration with Azure AD and the use of MFA there.
The next step is to force users to use SSO only. However, to ensure this, we still need to make some changes in our authentication flow.
We are also planning to bring these functions to DocuWare On-Premises.
Afterwards we will evaluate extending the login with DocuWare credentials with MFA/2FA.We are constantly striving to improve our products and appreciate your feedback and contribution.
Geoff M
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesGeoff M
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
2 votesGeoff M
shared this idea
·
-
2 votesGeoff M
shared this idea
·
-
27 votes
Thank you for your idea. Right now we are focusing on other topics, so we are not considering this idea for future releases. If the demand for this topic increases, we might add it to future plans.
Geoff M
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesGeoff M
shared this idea
·
-
11 votesGeoff M
shared this idea
·
-
3 votesGeoff M
shared this idea
·
-
5 votes
Thank you for your idea. We added it to our collection of ideas and features and will further investigate it. We currently cannot say exactly when this idea will be implemented. As soon as we have more information we will update its status.
Geoff M
supported this idea
·
-
58 votesGeoff M
supported this idea
·
-
21 votesGeoff M
shared this idea
·
-
27 votes
Thank you for your idea. Right now we are focusing on other topics, so we are not considering this idea for future releases. If the demand for this topic increases, we might add it to future plans.
Geoff M
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesGeoff M
supported this idea
·
-
178 votes
Your idea has been added to our backlog. We are now further investigating the idea.
Geoff M
supported this idea
·
-
33 votesGeoff M
supported this idea
·
-
31 votesGeoff M
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesGeoff M
supported this idea
·
This is a great idea. We have an application that needs to use a supplemental merge form if a box is checked. Perhaps this could be implemented as a "merge form behavior" similar to the existing field behavior options.