Ross Lister
My feedback
21 results found
-
9 votes
Thank you for your idea. We added it to our collection of ideas and features and will further investigate it. We currently cannot say exactly when this idea will be implemented. As soon as we have more information we will update its status.
Ross Lister supported this idea ·An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment Ross Lister commentedI thought of a way to do this; have the ability to select a Role that you have been assigned to. This would filter out all the capabilities assigned to that Role. All your dialog boxes and Lists would be related to the selected Role.
As it is at the moment, if you're performing multiple Roles, you may have a ton of Lists to look through. I know you can change order and ability to see Lists and Searches via the Preferences of the user but if we had the ability to choose the Role you wanted to perform, it could quickly show only the stuff you needed for that Role.
Ross Lister shared this idea · -
26 votes
Vielen Dank für Ihre Idee. Wir haben es unserer Sammlung von Ideen und Funktionen hinzugefügt und werden es weiter untersuchen. Wir können derzeit nicht genau sagen, wann diese Idee umgesetzt wird. Sobald wir weitere Informationen haben, werden wir den Status aktualisieren.
Ross Lister supported this idea · -
1 voteRoss Lister shared this idea ·
-
2 votes
Thank you for your idea. Right now we are focusing on other topics, so we are not considering this idea for future releases. If the demand for this topic increases, we might add it to future plans.
Ross Lister shared this idea · -
4 votesRoss Lister shared this idea ·
-
3 votesRoss Lister shared this idea ·
-
2 votesRoss Lister shared this idea ·
-
4 votesRoss Lister shared this idea ·
-
2 votesRoss Lister shared this idea ·
-
3 votesRoss Lister shared this idea ·
-
3 votesRoss Lister shared this idea ·
-
1 voteRoss Lister shared this idea ·
-
16 votes
Thank you for your idea. Right now we are focusing on other topics, so we are not considering this idea for future releases. If the demand for this topic increases, we might add it to future plans.
Ross Lister supported this idea · -
35 votes
Thank you for your idea. We added it to our collection of ideas and features and will further investigate it. We currently cannot say exactly when this idea will be implemented. As soon as we have more information we will update its status.
An error occurred while saving the comment Ross Lister commented6.12 Update: The newly added Automatic Number in Forms would lend itself to this feature but allowing barcode fonts within Forms would greatly enhance the product by matching paper forms being scanned to the evolution of that document.
Allow that Automatic Number field (and all others) to be placed onto the form using a barcode (2D and/or otherwise) font. The multi field option being used in DW Import and Print recognizing 2D barcodes is the perfect setup.
You would be creating the barcode instead of reading it based on the input received from the submitted forms. From that point forward you will always have a link back to the form that was originally submitted into the system.
A configuration screen for the version management of this Form could give instructions on how to deal with subsequent documents that come back into the system that match the barcode that was originally created and designated to match on.
An error occurred while saving the comment Ross Lister commentedMaybe the form was merged and requires a wet signature for some reason. Much easier to scan that same piece of paper back in and possibly version it upon ingestion?
Ross Lister supported this idea · -
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Ross Lister commentedNot sure why this feature was removed but it was very handy!
Ross Lister supported this idea · -
3 votes
Thank you for your idea. We added it to our collection of ideas and features and will further investigate it. We currently cannot say exactly when this idea will be implemented. As soon as we have more information we will update its status.
Ross Lister shared this idea · -
15 votes
Your idea has been added to our backlog. We are now further investigating the idea.
An error occurred while saving the comment Ross Lister commentedWould be nice to have drop down choices for common formats and then an advanced dialog to use regular expressions to validate data.
Ross Lister supported this idea · -
50 votes
Thank you for your idea. We added it to our collection of ideas and features and will further investigate it. We currently cannot say exactly when this idea will be implemented. As soon as we have more information we will update its status.
Ross Lister supported this idea · -
37 votes
Thank you for your idea.
Right now we are focusing on other topics, so we are not considering this idea for future releases. If the demand for this topic increases, we might add it to future plans.Ross Lister supported this idea · -
7 votes
Thank you for your idea. We added it to our collection of ideas and features and will further investigate it. We currently cannot say exactly when this idea will be implemented. As soon as we have more information we will update its status.
An error occurred while saving the comment Ross Lister commentedWas thinking the same thing. Add a New Version menu choice to the context menu that is presented when dragging and dropping a document from a tray unto a document in a list.
Currently if we are doing manual wet signatures another party will send their scanned document in PDF and we are clipping them together so the one not signed is the last document in the clipped docs.
Ross Lister supported this idea ·
This would also be a way to filter Stamps out for specific Functional Profiles by linking them to the Roles mentioned in my previous comment.