Nate French

My feedback

  1. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Configuration (English) » Workflow Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nate French shared this idea  · 
  2. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Client (English) » Forms  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nate French supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nate French commented  · 

    This would be amazing!! Sometimes still it is impossible to capture a signature at the time of form creation (multiple parties, document will be effective in the future, etc) So to simply re-scan and entirely index would be super killer.

    While you're in there, it only makes sense to put a multi choice option what to do with the scanned one, relative to the original generated one (clip before, clip after, entirely replace, store separately)

  3. 252 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    44 comments  ·  Client (English) » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nate French commented  · 

    A timeout for the web client is a reasonable and standard security measure. It is just as important for businesses as it is for anyone with their personal banking site left open. Customers really do want the session to expire. This is an unmet requirement in RFPs.

    I'm sure DocuWare sells quite a few additional licenses just to compensate for browser tabs left open. How many missed business opportunities is this worth? Because, in the end, it's money that talks.

    Nate French supported this idea  · 
  4. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Client (English) » Workflow  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nate French shared this idea  · 
  5. 19 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Client (English) » Workflow  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nate French commented  · 

    This would be extremely useful, but I understand that there would need to be significant development in order to get the new data into the correct column, and moreover, choose the correct row. I really want this too, but I think it would require some sort of a LOOP activity that would help with running through rows.

    By default (and this is not configurable on cloud) you can only loop through 9 rows -- the 10th row returns a failure, as it triggers "spam protection" and fully unpublishes the workflow.

    Nate French supported this idea  · 
  6. 27 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Nate French supported this idea  · 
  7. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Configuration (English) » Workflow Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nate French shared this idea  · 
  8. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Configuration (English) » Workflow Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nate French supported this idea  · 
  9. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Client (English) » Forms  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nate French shared this idea  · 
  10. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Client (English) » Storing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nate French commented  · 

    Yes please! I love this idea of having a dialog configuration profile (even if it is just one default one) which can be applied to dialogs.

    For the field order especially so. In so many implementations, ordering the fields in multiple dialogs with dozens of fields is no trivial thing. The opportunity for error is multiplied by the number of dialogs. Checking for those inevitable errors is just as tedious.

    Nate French supported this idea  · 
  11. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Client (English) » Indexing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nate French commented  · 

    Can we then call this the DEFAULT ORDER so that we can apply this order to dialogs? I'm picturing being able to tick off all the dialogs which should inherit the same order of the main arrangement.

    Nate French supported this idea  · 
  12. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Configuration (English) » Workflow Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nate French supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nate French commented  · 

    There is even a "Hide timeouts" button (the visibility eye next to the scale %) oh so close.

    Nate French shared this idea  · 
  13. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Client (English) » Exporting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nate French supported this idea  · 
  14. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Configuration (English) » Workflow Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nate French commented  · 

    But yes, I agree that it would be helpful to have the nesting. AS LONG AS you can rearrange things, or insert something new in a nested position.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nate French commented  · 

    You can use the uppercase "OR" operator in the conditions! I often do something like this:

    Status [ is equal ] New OR Pending
    AND
    DocType [ is equal ] Email OR Memo OR Letter
    AND
    ...

    I'm not sure it would make any sense to reverse the positions of the ORs and ANDs there .. I guess, well, unless you're using "Contains" as the operator.

    You can also use the "is not equal" operator such like:

    Vendor [ is not equal ] Roguey McRulebreaker

    Nate French supported this idea  · 
  15. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Configuration (English) » Workflow Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nate French commented  · 

    This would be a huge improvement for all of the complex workflows I've done... as long as this workflow-wide exception catcher is optional per error output!

    Even hiding the red lines would be helpful. See also: https://docuware.uservoice.com/forums/230572-configuration-english/suggestions/18565945-allow-error-links-to-be-hidden-in-workflow-designe

    Nate French supported this idea  · 
  16. 20 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Configuration (English) » Administration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nate French supported this idea  · 
  17. 141 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nate French commented  · 

    The ability to manually expire a license in use (e.g. a ghost session) would indeed be very helpful to have in the license usage window of the Admin Tool. It even could be a context-menu when right-clicking on the license in use.

    Nate French supported this idea  · 
  18. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Configuration (English) » Document trays  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nate French commented  · 

    Other context menu permissions as well, such as "reassign task to another user" shouldn't be available to everyone all the time.

    Nate French supported this idea  · 
  19. 13 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Configuration (English) » Document trays  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nate French commented  · 

    It went away when Silverlight went away for Document Tray configurations.
    Thankfully this is back now in 6.12 -- see page 16 of the What's New document.
    Link: http://www.docuware.com/main.asp?sig=dld&lan=en&loc=en&dwdblan=english&dwdbkat=do*&dwdbname=What's+new+in+docuware+version+6.12

    Nate French supported this idea  · 
  20. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Configuration (English) » Document trays  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nate French shared this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base