Nate French
My feedback
25 results found
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nate French
shared this idea
·
-
10 votes
Thank you for your idea. We added it to our collection of ideas and features and will further investigate it. We currently cannot say exactly when this idea will be implemented. As soon as we have more information we will update its status.
Nate French
shared this idea
·
-
35 votes
Thank you for your idea. We added it to our collection of ideas and features and will further investigate it. We currently cannot say exactly when this idea will be implemented. As soon as we have more information we will update its status.
Nate French
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Nate French
commented
This would be amazing!! Sometimes still it is impossible to capture a signature at the time of form creation (multiple parties, document will be effective in the future, etc) So to simply re-scan and entirely index would be super killer.
While you're in there, it only makes sense to put a multi choice option what to do with the scanned one, relative to the original generated one (clip before, clip after, entirely replace, store separately)
-
64 votesNate French
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteNate French
shared this idea
·
-
8 votesNate French
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteNate French
shared this idea
·
-
6 votes
Thank you for your idea. Right now we are focusing on other topics, so we are not considering this idea for future releases. If the demand for this topic increases, we might add it to future plans.
An error occurred while saving the comment Nate French
commented
Yes please! I love this idea of having a dialog configuration profile (even if it is just one default one) which can be applied to dialogs.
For the field order especially so. In so many implementations, ordering the fields in multiple dialogs with dozens of fields is no trivial thing. The opportunity for error is multiplied by the number of dialogs. Checking for those inevitable errors is just as tedious.
Nate French
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Thank you for your idea. We added it to our collection of ideas and features and will further investigate it. We currently cannot say exactly when this idea will be implemented. As soon as we have more information we will update its status.
An error occurred while saving the comment Nate French
commented
Can we then call this the DEFAULT ORDER so that we can apply this order to dialogs? I'm picturing being able to tick off all the dialogs which should inherit the same order of the main arrangement.
Nate French
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesNate French
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Nate French
commented
There is even a "Hide timeouts" button (the visibility eye next to the scale %) oh so close.
Nate French
shared this idea
·
-
16 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nate French
commented
But yes, I agree that it would be helpful to have the nesting. AS LONG AS you can rearrange things, or insert something new in a nested position.
An error occurred while saving the comment Nate French
commented
You can use the uppercase "OR" operator in the conditions! I often do something like this:
Status [ is equal ] New OR Pending
AND
DocType [ is equal ] Email OR Memo OR Letter
AND
...I'm not sure it would make any sense to reverse the positions of the ORs and ANDs there .. I guess, well, unless you're using "Contains" as the operator.
You can also use the "is not equal" operator such like:
Vendor [ is not equal ] Roguey McRulebreaker
Nate French
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nate French
commented
This would be a huge improvement for all of the complex workflows I've done... as long as this workflow-wide exception catcher is optional per error output!
Even hiding the red lines would be helpful. See also: https://docuware.uservoice.com/forums/230572-configuration-english/suggestions/18565945-allow-error-links-to-be-hidden-in-workflow-designe
Nate French
supported this idea
·
-
29 votesNate French
supported this idea
·
-
165 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nate French
commented
The ability to manually expire a license in use (e.g. a ghost session) would indeed be very helpful to have in the license usage window of the Admin Tool. It even could be a context-menu when right-clicking on the license in use.
Nate French
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
Thank you for your idea. Right now we are focusing on other topics, so we are not considering this idea for future releases. If the demand for this topic increases, we might add it to future plans.
An error occurred while saving the comment Nate French
commented
Other context menu permissions as well, such as "reassign task to another user" shouldn't be available to everyone all the time.
Nate French
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nate French
commented
It went away when Silverlight went away for Document Tray configurations.
Thankfully this is back now in 6.12 -- see page 16 of the What's New document.
Link: http://www.docuware.com/main.asp?sig=dld&lan=en&loc=en&dwdblan=english&dwdbkat=do*&dwdbname=What's+new+in+docuware+version+6.12Nate French
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteNate French
shared this idea
·
-
69 votes
Thank you for your idea. We added it to our collection of ideas and features and will further investigate it. We currently cannot say exactly when this idea will be implemented. As soon as we have more information we will update its status.
Nate French
supported this idea
·
-
28 votes
Your idea has been added to our backlog. We are now further investigating the idea.
Nate French
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
Thank you for your contribution. We are now working on a new version of the Workflow Designer, which will bring a whole new user experience, so we set this wish to “Planned”.
I’d like to point out that a couple of things are possible in the meantime, like reordering decision and now also reordering data assignments. Multiselect will come with the new version.
In case of changing size and shape of the activities, we are not planning to do this currently.
I’d be happy to learn why and how this would help you in your daily work.Nate French
supported this idea
·
Furthermore, the value of this delay should be published so that systems can be configured to know how soon to check on a transfer which stopped. Assuming 20s delay, if no data has been transferred in the last 12 seconds, the client can know to hurry up and refresh the directory so that it can resume / overwrite / delete and retry the transfer.