abdalfttah
My feedback
16 results found
-
51 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment abdalfttah
supported this idea
·
-
66 votes
Your idea has been added to our backlog. We are now further investigating the idea.
abdalfttah
supported this idea
·
-
68 votesabdalfttah
supported this idea
·
-
147 votes
Thank you for your idea. We added it to our collection of ideas and features and will further investigate it. We currently cannot say exactly when this idea will be implemented. As soon as we have more information we will update its status.
abdalfttah
supported this idea
·
-
237 votesabdalfttah
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Thank you for your idea. Right now we are focusing on other topics, so we are not considering this idea for future releases. If the demand for this topic increases, we might add it to future plans.
abdalfttah
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
Thank you for your idea. Right now we are focusing on other topics, so we are not considering this idea for future releases. If the demand for this topic increases, we might add it to future plans.
abdalfttah
supported this idea
·
-
184 votes
Of course the security of our users is important to us.
As you have noticed, this idea still has the same status, but was not declined. That means we evaluate it regularly.One reason why we have decided not to add this security feature yet is that we will first change the authentication flow.
As a first step, we introduced the Identity Service in the DocuWare Cloud with Version 7.3, which allows integration with Azure AD and the use of MFA there.
The next step is to force users to use SSO only. However, to ensure this, we still need to make some changes in our authentication flow.
We are also planning to bring these functions to DocuWare On-Premises.
Afterwards we will evaluate extending the login with DocuWare credentials with MFA/2FA.We are constantly striving to improve our products and appreciate your feedback and contribution.
abdalfttah
supported this idea
·
-
189 votes
Your idea has been added to our backlog. We are now further investigating the idea.
abdalfttah
supported this idea
·
-
20 votes
Thank you for your idea. Right now we are focusing on other topics, so we are not considering this idea for future releases. If the demand for this topic increases, we might add it to future plans.
abdalfttah
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesabdalfttah
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
Thank you for your idea.
Right now we are focusing on other topics, so we are not considering this idea for future releases. If the demand for this topic increases, we might add it to future plans.An error occurred while saving the comment abdalfttah
commented
it is very important option and all customers request this option with the date and time as well.
abdalfttah
supported this idea
·
-
93 votes
Thank you for your idea.
Right now we are focusing on other topics, so we are not considering this idea for future releases. If the demand for this topic increases, we might add it to future plans.abdalfttah
supported this idea
·
-
60 votesabdalfttah
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Can you please describe this in a little more detail?
Why do you want images as result?
abdalfttah
shared this idea
·
-
3 votes
Thank you for your idea. We added it to our collection of ideas and features and will further investigate it. We currently cannot say exactly when this idea will be implemented. As soon as we have more information we will update its status.
abdalfttah
shared this idea
·
Watermark should have the company's name and username who printed/emailed/downloaded the document.
This should be applicable to both Web Browser and MobileApp.
Watermark should also appear on the document when opening it on the DW Viewer. This option should be turned on or off by the system admin for all users.