Skip to content

R.J.

My feedback

23 results found

  1. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    R.J. commented  · 

    It would be great to specify different result-lists to a workflow.
    https://www.docuware.com/support_faq/index.php?solution_id=5315

    This article says that a workflow uses the standard lists but I want to specify it because I want to reduce the dialog fields which are displayed if I want to change them. It is not needed to see all.

    R.J. supported this idea  · 
  2. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    R.J. supported this idea  · 
  3. 8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    R.J. supported this idea  · 
  4. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    R.J. supported this idea  · 
  5. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    R.J. supported this idea  · 
  6. 223 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    R.J. supported this idea  · 
  7. 244 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    R.J. supported this idea  · 
  8. 8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    R.J. shared this idea  · 
  9. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    R.J. commented  · 

    Habe genau dasselbe Problem plus etwas noch weigreifenderes.
    Unsere Rechnungen müssen mind. von zwei Personen freigegeben werden, wie üblich.
    Es gibt allerdings Abteilungen, wo sich zwei Personen gegenseitig vertreten aber auch beide Personen freigeben müssen. Wichtig is aber, dass eine Person nicht doppelt freigibt. Hier ein Beispiel zur besseren Verständnis:

    Aktuell:

    Vertretungsliste1: PersonA->PersonB
    Vertretungsliste2: PersonB->PersonA

    Person B ist krank oder im Urlaub.

    1. Rechnung geht an Vertretungsliste1, Person A gibt erste Freigabe.
    2. Rechnung geht an Vertretungsliste2, Vertreung greift und Rechnung geht an Person A.
    3. Person A gibt zweimal frei.

    Dies soll nicht geschehen. Habe dazu ein halbwegs funktionierendes Workaround im Workflow gebastelt allerdings passiert der Fehler in bestimmten Fällen immernoch und diese kann ich nicht rausfiltern.

    Lösung:
    Zwischen Schritt 1-2 eine Globalevariable(ZugewiesenAn) füllen lassen, mit dem User der die Rechnung als nächstes tatsächlich durch die Vertretungsliste zugewiesen bekommt und eine Globalevariable(PersonFreigabe1) mit der Person der ersten Freigabe füllen.
    Dann einen Check durchführen ob PersonFreigabe1 = ZugewiesenAn, wenn ja, dann Freigabe2 an Person C zuweisen sonst weiter wie normal.

    R.J. supported this idea  · 
  10. 16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    R.J. supported this idea  · 
  11. 47 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    R.J. supported this idea  · 
  12. 86 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    R.J. supported this idea  · 
  13. 221 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    R.J. supported this idea  · 
  14. 271 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    R.J. supported this idea  · 
  15. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    R.J. supported this idea  · 
  16. 65 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    R.J. supported this idea  · 
  17. 236 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    R.J. supported this idea  · 
  18. 212 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    R.J. supported this idea  · 
  19. 192 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    R.J. supported this idea  · 
  20. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    R.J. commented  · 

    Habe ähnliches Problem. Lösung wäre für mich entweder, man kann den Namen des Anhangs dynamisch bestimmen im Workflow Designer oder es wird der Dokumentenname genutzt dem man im Archiv festgelegt hat.

    Bei letzteres könnte ich zumindenst ein Workaround anwenden.
    Dann kann ich im Workflow nämlich das Feld für den Dokumentennamen kurz mit verschiedene Namen füllen, so wie ich es haben will und nach versenden der Mail wieder zurücksetzen indem ich mir das Feld für den Dokumentennamen in eine globale Variable zwischenspeichere.

    Problem ist nämlich, dass unsere vor dem Archivieren doc*********** heißen aber ich für das versenden einen bestimmten Dateinamen für die Kunden brauche. Zurzeit löse ich das Problem mit der Importkonfiguration wo ich den Dateinamen dynamisch bestimmen kann allerdings ist hier der Nachteil, dass ich die Mails manuell und nur einzeln nacheinander verschicken kann. Dies kostet ziemlich viel Zeit.

    R.J. supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base